Subject: | Re: [OM] Lumix 7-14, was: IMG: Angels-01 - Carlos |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:19:24 -0600 |
> > Can't speak for the Panasonic, but the ZD 7-14 could not be better > protected against flare - I can't think of an occasion when flare has been > evident, even with the sun in the frame. Flare with the ZD 7-14 is a bit unusual in that it's rather pinched and has that thong look to it. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT Interesting image?, John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 47: a slow week, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Lumix 7-14, was: IMG: Angels-01 - Carlos, Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Lumix 7-14, was: IMG: Angels-01 - Carlos, philippe.amard |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |