Thank you Wiliam for your efforts to sooth my need :-) Much
appreciated...
Must have been quite something to use the 90-250/2.8 beast. I've never
even
seen one.
Unfortunately, it's not quite the same thing :-( I have used various
C*non Supertele
lenses in the past (300/2.8, 400/2.8, and have once experienced a
200/1.8) and
I am specifically just interested in the "look" of the 250/2.0 - the
specific
DOF characteristics of that aperture and focal length, as well as the
corner light
falloff at f/2 (which is supposed to be considerable according to Gary
Reese, but I
actually like that for the type of images I usually make with a lens
wide open, i.e.
coupled with shallow DOF).
I also would just like to have seen what people have done with this
fine lens. Surely
when peering through it, one would have to actually force onesself to
*stop* taking
photos? (or when one collapses from the strain of handling 4Kgs of
glass :-)
Sigh...
On 05 Nov 2009, at 2:19 PM, Wiliam Wagenaar wrote:
> Dawid,
>
> I wish I could help you out on this question. I can only find 3
> photos I
> made one fiine day when I was allowed to use the ZD 90-250mm 2.8 for a
> short while. Not exactly the lens you requested, but does come close,
> well at least as close as I can get ;-(
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/wiliam/tags/90250mm/
>
> Wiliam
>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: Dawid Loubser [mailto:dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Verzonden: donderdag 5 november 2009 12:42
>> Aan: Olympus Camera Discussion
>> Onderwerp: Re: [OM] 250/2
>>
>>
>> Tim, I was was requesting images to see how people have been
>> using the
>> 250/2.0
>> for "non-test" subject, i.e. artistically, in order for us to
>> see the
>> drawing
>> character of the lens.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|