Subject: | Re: [OM] Digicam for the ages (was "Nathan's PAW 32: beach, wine, cycling and much else") |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:27:19 +1000 |
> Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm waiting for someone to just say that it's all in our heads... > Well a digital image is made up of 1s and 0s, obviously the 1s are polarized and the 0s not, this must be the reason (otherwise it's all in your head and you're talking through your *rs*). ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Digicam for the ages (was "Nathan's PAW 32: beach, wine, cycling and much else"), Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Question - Olympus hard cases, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Digicam for the ages (was "Nathan's PAW 32: beach, wine, cyclin, usher99 |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Circular Polarizers compared - a quick and dirty, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |