Subject: | Re: [OM] a glut of Zuiko 8/2.8s ? |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:02:55 +1000 |
> > It would be a 16mm fisheye on an e-body. Not bad in terms of double > duty, I've always thought. > I bought a Peleng 8mm (N*k*n mount) a few years ago and it works pretty well as a full frame fisheye on an E-510. The fact that it's cropped works well with the Peleng as they tend to have a few strange internal reflections which show up on the edge of the image circle on a full 35mm frame. ...Wayne -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM 4Ti Fang was: This looks like a deal, John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Another Colorado image posted, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] a glut of Zuiko 8/2.8s ?, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] a glut of Zuiko 8/2.8s ?, Sue Pearce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |