| Subject: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:36:49 -0500 |
> > If that's really what he said then he's "talking through his *rse" as we'd > say here ! > The guy might be referring to CA correction. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Another Colorado image posted, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] To OM2000 or not to OM2000, Ian Manners |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images, Wayne Harridge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images, Jez Cunningham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |