Subject: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:33:02 +1000 |
> > Another topic - or another aspect of the same one ... which of the many > parts of Raw Therapee should I do most experimentation with first? > There > is a bewildering choice. > I've been using RawTherapy since I got my E-510 (nearly 2 years ago - it's obsolete !) and haven't done much experimentation with it. The only things I change on a regular basis are "exposure", "white balance" (pick an area that should be neutral grey and use "spot WB" usually) and "...Noise reduction" (only if ISO is >400 though - doesn't seem necessary at ISO 400 or less). These basic adjustments normally give me a reasonable jpeg to work with in PSP. ...Wayne -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Another Colorado image posted, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] TOPE 38: launched (finally!), and time to send in further entries for TOPE 38/39, Olaf Greve |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images, Brian Swale |
Next by Thread: | [OM] a glut of Zuiko 8/2.8s ?, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |