Subject: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:57:49 -0500 |
> > I'm not objecting your statement here but I would like to know in which way > you see the big C's JPEG deficiency. > Do I need to? Isn't it, like totally common knowledge that the Canons have to be shot in RAW mode in order to get anything better than 5x7" snapshot quality? :) AG (believe nothing you read on the web) Schnozz -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images, C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [IMG] coming back from work last April., Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Definition of digital images, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |