Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite

[Piers Hemy]

Indeed, let's hope so!  And I hope Jeff has learned enough already, already.


--  
Piers

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 29 July 2009 12:56
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite

Maybe that's the indication of "heavily automated" that Jeff mentions. :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Piers Hemy wrote:
> You want my feedback on the posted images?
> 
> YUK!  Where did the contrast go?
> 
> --
> Piers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Keller [mailto:om-list@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 29 July 2009 08:09
> To: 'Olympus Camera Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite
> 
> --snip   
> 
> I'm seeing a number of local real estate photographers creating very 
> heavily processed pictures. I haven't heard any feedback from
buyers/sellers yet.
> I'm guessing the workflow is very heavily automated ... which I hope 
> to learn about.
> http://www.julianalee.com/homes/2009/monroe_dr_300/home-for-sale-pictu
> res.ht
> m is rather typical. 
> 
> --snip
> 
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/