Subject: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:55:57 -0400 |
Maybe that's the indication of "heavily automated" that Jeff mentions. :-) Chuck Norcutt Piers Hemy wrote: > You want my feedback on the posted images? > > YUK! Where did the contrast go? > > -- > Piers > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Keller [mailto:om-list@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 29 July 2009 08:09 > To: 'Olympus Camera Discussion' > Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite > > --snip > > I'm seeing a number of local real estate photographers creating very heavily > processed pictures. I haven't heard any feedback from buyers/sellers yet. > I'm guessing the workflow is very heavily automated ... which I hope to > learn about. > http://www.julianalee.com/homes/2009/monroe_dr_300/home-for-sale-pictures.ht > m is rather typical. > > --snip > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Week 30 - a few fotos for fun, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Week 30 - a few fotos for fun, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite, Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite, Piers Hemy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |