Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:55:57 -0400
Maybe that's the indication of "heavily automated" that Jeff mentions. :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Piers Hemy wrote:
> You want my feedback on the posted images?
> 
> YUK!  Where did the contrast go?
> 
> --  
> Piers 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Keller [mailto:om-list@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 29 July 2009 08:09
> To: 'Olympus Camera Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) nearly, or not quite
> 
> --snip   
> 
> I'm seeing a number of local real estate photographers creating very heavily
> processed pictures. I haven't heard any feedback from buyers/sellers yet.
> I'm guessing the workflow is very heavily automated ... which I hope to
> learn about.
> http://www.julianalee.com/homes/2009/monroe_dr_300/home-for-sale-pictures.ht
> m is rather typical. 
> 
> --snip
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz