I can see why you took the photos and printed these particular images,
Dawid: they are interesting technically -- to see the edges of the
wire, for instance, as well as the tones. The best one, for me as
well, is the grass. However, I am sure that Beach Detail looks good
on a print as well.
Chris
On 22 Jul 2009, at 07:39, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> "Beach Detail"
> I specifically took this image to compare it to a near-identical one I
> made 4 years ago
> with Canon's brilliant 100/2.8 USM Macro. No obvious conclusions yet,
> but I love the
> minute detail the Zuiko captures. Natural light, ~1:2 magnification on
> glossy RC paper)
> http://fc08.deviantart.com/fs46/f/2009/202/5/a/Beach_Detail_by_philosomatographer.jpg
> (90/2.0 Macro at f/11, FP4+, 8x10in sepia-toned print)
>
> "Grass glow"
> Grasses swishing in late-afternoon sun and coastal wind.
> http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs46/f/2009/202/c/5/Grass_glow_by_philosomatographer.jpg
> (90/2.0 Macro at f/2.0, FP4+, 8x10in sepia-toned print on glossy RC
> paper)
>
> "Delicate things come in threes"
> I decided to, for the moment, leave this on a cold steely colour,
> tempted as I am to tone it.
> http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs46/f/2009/202/d/a/Delicate_things_come_in_threes_by_philosomatographer.jpg
> (90/2.0 Macro at ~f/11.0 [cant remember], FP4+, 8x10in print on glossy
> RC paper)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
