Subject: | Re: [OM] DPReview on the "standard lens" |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 23 May 2009 20:10:58 +1000 |
Yeah, I know what you mean Ken, I really like the 35/85 combination over the 50. ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Norton [] > Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 12:55 AM > To: Olympus Camera Discussion > Subject: Re: [OM] DPReview on the "standard lens" > > > 50mm has never been one of my favorite focal-lengths. It seems to > always be > too long or too short. I personally prefer the 35mm focal length as my > "standard" just because it allows me to show my subject in its > surroundings > without distortion. You can also zone-focus it. But does this have to > do > with it being closer to 42mm? No, it just has to do with my own > artistic > preference. > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 20/05/2009: boring lens tests ;-), Dawid Loubser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 20/05/2009: boring lens tests ;-), Wiliam Wagenaar |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dog cropping?, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] DPReview on the "standard lens", Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |