Chuck, just finished reading it.
It gives me a perfect reasoning to justify my reluctance of cropping my
photographs ... (see first comment, below the article - if I understood
it right).
:-)
Fernando.
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Ummm. Did anyone actually read the reference I posted? The definition
> of a standard lens as a geometric reference was the whole point of the
> article.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Carlos J. Santisteban wrote:
>
>
>> I agree with AG -- 50mm is too narrow as "standard" for me....
>>
>> There's no magic with the 50mm focal. I think the definition of a "standard"
>> lens is a confrontation of subjective, artistic views and technical
>> reasons; 43.3mm is just a geometric reference.
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|