I don't think there will be big difference for a lens to perform in film or
digital. So far today's digital impressions all match my impressions with
film yesterday. Go ahead to play more with your G.Zuiko, if it is not a bad
sample you will love the performance. BTW, you don't need to shoot at F5.6,
F2.8 is good enough unless you really need the DOF.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fernando Gonzalez Gentile"
Now this is good news for me. Since i bought my first OM 2 I felt
not-so-happy with my 713594 G.Zuiko. I could have bought a MC 900xxx,
NIB but missed the chance. Someone gave me a badly used MC 900xxx, and
it did well (my Technology TOPE entry
<http://www.tope.nl/tope_show_entry.php?event=25&pic=21> was done with
this 900xxx).
Could it be that those comparison shots were done on a digital body
instead of film, as Ken pointed out?
If not, I'll start using my G.Zuiko more frequently :-) - or perhaps to
scan a Provia on which it shines at ƒ/5,6 !.
Fernando.
C.H.Ling wrote:
> Thanks for Moose and Chuck remind me about the S/N issue, it is a little
> strange that I found both SC and MC 109xxx has very similar performance. I
> don't think it is due to bad samples as both did very well even under 21MP
> sensor wide open, much better than I had expected.
>
> Test samples repost, RAW converted with sharpness set to zero (minimum):
>
> 50/1.4 SC, S/N 56xxxx (F1.4 and F2.8)
>
[snip]
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|