Subject: | Re: [OM] ISO may not be accurate |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:52:44 -0500 |
That's interesting. DPReview has been reporting actual ISO test results for a long time. DXO says the Canon 5D's ISO 100 is actually 92. DPreview reported it as 125. And, of course, Canons says it's 100. Who's right? I doesn't make any difference until I have to get out the external meter for flash. Chuck Norcutt AS wrote: >>From Adorama: > > > > http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?article=020109&op=academy_new > > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Latest Combination, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 300mm & 400mm Zuiko, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] ISO may not be accurate, AS |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ISO may not be accurate, Tom Fenwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |