This shouldn't be news. Camera magazines often ran articles about how camera
makers reated the ISO sensitivity of their meters and film makers rated
their products long before digital. We all learned to adjust.
Bill Pearce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] ISO may not be accurate
> That's interesting. DPReview has been reporting actual ISO test results
> for a long time. DXO says the Canon 5D's ISO 100 is actually 92.
> DPreview reported it as 125. And, of course, Canons says it's 100.
> Who's right? I doesn't make any difference until I have to get out the
> external meter for flash.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> AS wrote:
>>>From Adorama:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?article=020109&op=academy_new
>>
>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.15/1921 - Release Date: 1/28/2009
6:37 AM
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|