Re: [OM] dance photo shoot

[C.H.Ling]

All the new version lenses from Canyon has big improvements, same for the 
non IS/IS version of 70-200/2.8/4. Here is a link for Canyon lenses test:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0&Lens=114&Camera=9&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=412

The 16-35 II has quite some improvements on the wide end but loss some 
details at the long end. CA seems improved a lot, this is very critical for 
me.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ws"

>I have the 16-35 first version. I'm not super impressed by it and
> I wonder what the II version improves upon?
>
> I do have the Can*n 70-200/2.8 IS lens and every shot from it is very 
> nice.
> Probably the best lens I have ever used in that range. I'm generally not
> all that impressed with Can*n lens, but this one is nice. the /4 version
> may be a good alternative.
>
> Wayne
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/