Subject: | Re: [OM] dance photo shoot |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:19:14 +0800 |
Yes, that is a good lens but I prefer the 70-200/4 IS, it has the same or better optical quality and much lighter. Anyway, both are too expensive for me and I enjoy using OM lenses more. I wish I had carried the OM 50-250 instead of the Tamron 70-300 so that I had not rely on the AF. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-Zoom-Lens-Reviews.aspx C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: <Mike> > Danger, Will Robinson. > I have read that is Canyon's vacuum cleaner lens. That sucking sound > is your cash leaving your back pocket and going into Canyon's account. > > Mike > > Next time I will borrow my friend's 70-200/2.8 IS and try it out. > > C.H.Ling > -- -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Upsampling/Sharpening technology [was E system metering was Dpreview Challengesbeta: Firstwinners], montsnmags@xxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT--A few New Ones, Donald |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] dance photo shoot, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] dance photo shoot, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |