Moose wrote:
> ...
>
> The R-L processing is interesting and, in the example, clearly a bit
> better than USM. But lets get right down to it. Anyone interested in
> this stuff, I'd appreciate your votes on the alternates here.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/ARL_Sharp/Fox.htm>
>
> Problems I see with his presentation and examples ...
Simply looking at the on-screen examples provided, while also noting the
problems you specify, to my eye the R-L processed image is the best of
them, though it's a fine like between it and "Moose Pass 2B".
Cheers,
Marc
Noosa Heads, Oz
http://www.parknmeter.om/gallery
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|