----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose"
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>> I prefer the RL version, at least it does not affect the
>> color/saturation.
>> Of course if it is your intention that's ok.
>>
>
> No, no, no. I really sorry I didn't remember to put it in the first
> post. The difference in color saturation has nothing to do with the
> up-sampling/sharpening that I did.
>
Then I don't see much different there, Moose 2x is already very nice to me.
If you are talking about 1.5hr RL works, it is simply crazy.
>> When you are talking about print, different kinds of printing techniques
>> need different level of sharpening, offset need the most and Frontier
>> type need less. If you are making a small print, you need more sharpening
>> if you are making a giant print with a high pixel file you need less.
>>
>
> Agreed. I only mentioned it because he talked about doing the tests for
> printing, then didn't address the issues associated with sharpening for
> printing or compare any actual prints.
>
Your point is well taken, web use and printing do need different level of
sharpenings.
C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|