I never really appreciated the lensbaby. Other than the fact it can be
tilted, the rest just seems gimmicky. Perhaps I am missing something?
But it does raise the question of value to OOF areas of an image.
It seems that the issue is the visual tension created, and whether that
is a desirable aspect of the image, or just a new trick.
Wayne
At 05:57 AM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
>Or rather, a badly focused photo, taken using a lensbaby:
>
>http://the.earth.li/~paddy/cgi-bin/indiv.pl?dir=alans_wedding_december_2008&photo=alans_wedding_074.jpg&o=72
>
>and another for good measure:
>
>http://the.earth.li/~paddy/cgi-bin/indiv.pl?dir=alans_wedding_december_2008&photo=alans_wedding_077.jpg&o=72
>
>Admittedly drunken snapshots, but still a bit of fun.
>
>paddy
\
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
