Subject: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:07:24 -0500 |
Better than most but I would still wish it wasn't there. You're saved by the pretty face which leads one to look away from those OOF elements. :-) Chuck Norcutt C.H.Ling wrote: > How does this one look? > > http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/180-04_F.jpg > > I don't use foreground OOF much as it is difficult to control but it is > certainly good when done properly. > > C.H.Ling > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "WayneS" <om3ti@xxxxxxxx> > >> One thing I have noticed in the photos posted, mine and others, >> is that foreground OOF elements are often a distraction, in even >> the best of shots. I have few of my shots where I find it OK. >> I'm curious what others think? >> >> WayneS >> > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |