Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Sharpeining, was: Flickr account problems

Subject: Re: [OM] Sharpeining, was: Flickr account problems
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:23:38 -0500
It will probably take me a month to absorb this.  Right now I'm busy 
trying to recover my print sizing screw ups for my daughter's collage 
project.  My brain must have been elsewhere when I sized them.

Chuck Norcutt

Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> You've answered a question I hadn't yet imagined :-)
> 
> Well, this is what's been puzzling me:
> 
> I've been doing USM and LCE the way I learned here.
> After you posted the link 
> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/high-pass-sharpening.shtml>, 
> I went a little further and found something which seemed obvious:  
> making the sharpening in the luminance channel only  - maybe everyone 
> did so and I hadn't noticed.
> Take into account I use film only, and my 'noise' standard is that of 
> the 4000ED - nonetheless either DFine or NeatImage 'find' it noisy, 
> specially if I play with NikonScan curves to balance color and contrast, 
> or use Nikon Scan UnsharpMask.
> 
> Found this very clever 
> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/instant_photoshop.shtml>: 
> "Go to *Image / Mode / Lab Color* and then *Window / Show Channels*. In 
> the *Channels *palette select the *Lightness channel*. Now choose 
> *Filter / Sharpen / Unsharp Mask*."
> 
> _ and I felt happy for a couple of days, until found this thread: 
> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t28753.html>
> 
> Wow - if there's trouble when going to sRGB from Adobe RGB '98 ( 
> "conversion *intents*" ) - it should be worse when going from RGB to 
> Lab, and coming back to RGB !!!.
> Thanks to Ken, I had scanned another Velvia 50 cactus and nailed in the 
> green, but sharpened in Lab. Found nothing too wrong, ignorance still 
> bliss, I hadn't found that thread yet. Maybe you could make the effort 
> and glimpse for a second or two this huge Flickr file - I won't feel bad 
> if you refuse:
> small: <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/3096675514/>
> large: 
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/3096675514/sizes/o/>
> (tripod mounted 65-116, 135/4,5 @8, maybe 1:10x, OM 2n on Auto mode 
> +1/3, Velvia 50, perceptual intent conversion to sRGB, NeatImage).
> 
> OK, despite it looks right for me, the rationale of a round trip to Lab 
> is confusing. I don't completely understand Lab, and feel too lazy to 
> read Dan Margulis books (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Margulis).
> 
> Months ago, Chuck posted another tutorial - which I found one of the 
> most useful:
> Found in <http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/unsharp-mask.htm> 
> this advice:
> 
> _Remedies_: Color shifts can be avoided entirely by performing the 
> unsharp mask within the "lightness" channel in LAB mode. 
> **A better technique, which avoids converting between _color spaces 
> <http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/color-spaces.htm>_ and 
> minimizes posterization 
> <http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/posterization.htm>, is to**:
> 1) Create a duplicate layer
> 2) Sharpen this layer like normal using the unsharp mask
> 3) Blend sharpened layer with the original using "luminosity" mode in 
> the layers window
> 
> Tried it two days ago on a .jpg out my 720SW - it works nice too.
> 
> What I now feel reluctant to use is the traditional USM - I'm beared 
> towards 'sharpeining' in the Luminance channel - so:
> 
> 1- the 'high pass' technique - is or is not related to Luminance 
> channel: seems so.
> 2- Lab .... ?
> 3- Blending sharpened layer using Luminosity Mode ... subtle sharpening 
> and have two sliders to play with, which I didn't understand yet.
> 
> Last:
> 1- what if I do nothing in NikonScan, except ICE, and work anything in CS3.
> 2- *when* in the workflow do I apply Luminance sharpening. If I have 
> amusing color shifts while USMasking this was a non issue ... but this 
> is getting more complex, isn't it ?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Fernando
> 
> 
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I hope that answered the question you haven't yet asked. :-)
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>   
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.17/1846 - Release Date: 12/12/2008 
> 6:59 PM
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz