Yes, the minilab scan has very different color calibration to normal sRGB,
usually very high sharpening too. A proper scanned and adjusted image will
be much better, just finished 19 rolls of negatives from a trip to Europe in
1992. Here are two samples:
Olympus XA, F5.6, Kodak Gold 100-2
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/EU92_04_15.jpg
OM40, Kodak Ektar 100, Zuiko 35-105 1st version (early morning, shot through
holtel room window)
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/EU92_16_03.jpg
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>>> I would agree with you. My little 6.3mp Fujifilm F10 has produced some
>>> images that just blew me away. After several years of having C41 film
>>> processed to CD by a department store lab, I was amazed at the
>>> resolution
>>> that the little camera provided.
>>>
> Hardly a fair comparison. Nothing against the F10, I liked mine so much
> I went to an F30 and Carol is still using the F10. On the other hand, if
> you shot it with the EV setting wrong and a softening filter, then
> mis-set contrast in an editor, that would be closer to what was being
> done to your film shots.
>
> The difference between a minilab CD of scanned film images and proper
> scans is just enormous.
>
> Moose
> --
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
