Hi, Moose,
I finally did get an old scanner, a Dimage Scan Dual II, and, even with that
I could get better scans from my negatives than the Wal-Mart CDs provided.
However, the little F10 is impressive. The image that I made reference to
is in a gallery that is still being treated as spam by my new email handler.
I will see if I can send a link somehow.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] On free film...
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>>> I would agree with you. My little 6.3mp Fujifilm F10 has produced some
>>> images that just blew me away. After several years of having C41 film
>>> processed to CD by a department store lab, I was amazed at the
>>> resolution
>>> that the little camera provided.
>>>
> Hardly a fair comparison. Nothing against the F10, I liked mine so much
> I went to an F30 and Carol is still using the F10. On the other hand, if
> you shot it with the EV setting wrong and a softening filter, then
> mis-set contrast in an editor, that would be closer to what was being
> done to your film shots.
>
> The difference between a minilab CD of scanned film images and proper
> scans is just enormous.
>
> Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|