Subject: | Re: [OM] e-6 processing |
---|---|
From: | WayneS <om3ti@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:55:23 -0500 |
At 10:32 AM 11/24/2008, Ag wrote: ><snip> The differences were significant. Fujichrome 100 was a >touch grainy and when Provia came out, we all quickly migrated to it as the >skies were much cleaner. Unfortunately, Provia didn't have the edge detail >and acutance which Fujichrome 100 had. If one is scanning the film and only using the digital output, does acutance matter as much since sharpening can be done with post processing? Just curious what the experts think. WayneS -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] The olden days, was: e-6 processing, "J. Van Brimmer" |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Ektar 100-freebie, mebbe, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] e-6 processing, Michael Collins |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] e-6 processing, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |