The stack loader is useful for unmounted slides, obviously; and it was
always considered as an expensive adapter.
Agree on the easiness to load-unload-reload single slides into the
N1kon scanners.
It is funny too, for me at least.
Fernando.
Piers Hemy wrote:
> I assume the 5000 would be the better option because it accepts the slide
> stack loader? I looked at one for my 4000, but baulked at the price, and
> went without. It is surprisingly easy to load-unload-reload single slides
> into the N1kon scanners, and once the rhythm was established, I found that
> scanning 100 or so slides was no great hassle. Though I have no experience
> with the Epson flatbed, I suspect that the ergonomics of load-unload-reload
> for a batch will actually be worse than doing them all singly!
>
> --
> Piers
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Ralf Loi
> Sent: 26 June 2008 12:22
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Scanners - was Old and new Velvia 50
>
> --snip
>
> The only problem with the Nikon V is that it accepts only one slide at a
> time, and I want also to scan a lot of older slides. Price aside, a 5000
> would be a better option for me, but it is costly, so this is the reason for
> the Epson that can do a batch of 12 mounted slides.
>
> Ralf Loi
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|