So, isn't a 16MB address space (vs 1MB) and double the performance
enough innovation for you?
Chuck Norcutt
Ian Manners wrote:
> The 80286 lacked much in the
> way of innovation, being a faster 8086 from a 'general' hardware point
> of view, guess the same can be said of the 80186 but I had actually
> forgotted that chip altogether due to never having seen one.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|