Hi Brian,
Really like to 100/2 with film but as you suggested it thought I'd give
it a go on the E-1.
Took it for a walk this afternoon & the combination seemed to work quite
well.
Posted a couple of examples:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6961406&size=lg
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6961418&size=lg
Doubt they would have come out much better with the 14-54 (maybe not
worse either).
Regards - Martyn Smoothy
bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Just a 'hello" to all, and a quick note.
>
> I find the Zuiko 100/2 to be a great performer on the E-1. Very sharp images
> with good colour.
>
> Even though the E-1 frequently yields sharper shots than OM bodies, due to
> the relative absence of vibration, using a tripod usually gives even sharper
> images.
>
> I still have a heap of manual Zuikos (and others) and am shooting film most
> weeks.
>
> I'm probably shooting myself in the foot by writing this; but regarding the
> recent discussion about Tokina AT-X lenses, I have a Tok AT-X 24-40 f/2.8,
> the only lens I have ever bought from KEH.
>
> It IS very sharp, but ... it has the weird and annoying characteristic of
> unexpectedly and unpredictably dumping a large round patch of blue (sky) in
> the middle of an image. So I haven't used it as much as I expected I would.
>
> Brian Swale
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|