Hello Brian,
Since I became more "digital" the 100f2 is the only OM-lens I still use
regularly on my E-1.
It is indeed a terrific performer, and combined with the "digital"
1.4teleconverter I use
it often wide open with good results.
Iwert
2008/2/17, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Just a 'hello" to all, and a quick note.
>
> I find the Zuiko 100/2 to be a great performer on the E-1. Very sharp
> images
> with good colour.
>
> Even though the E-1 frequently yields sharper shots than OM bodies, due to
> the relative absence of vibration, using a tripod usually gives even
> sharper
> images.
>
> I still have a heap of manual Zuikos (and others) and am shooting film
> most
> weeks.
>
> I'm probably shooting myself in the foot by writing this; but regarding
> the
> recent discussion about Tokina AT-X lenses, I have a Tok AT-X 24-40 f/2.8,
> the only lens I have ever bought from KEH.
>
> It IS very sharp, but ... it has the weird and annoying characteristic of
> unexpectedly and unpredictably dumping a large round patch of blue (sky)
> in
> the middle of an image. So I haven't used it as much as I expected I
> would.
>
> Brian Swale
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|