It's good to hear from you Brian. I hope that all is well down under
(and around a bit).
Might the large patch of blue be flare? It's the only reason that I
can think of for such a phenomenon.
Chris
On 17 Feb 2008, at 04:20, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Just a 'hello" to all, and a quick note.
>
> I find the Zuiko 100/2 to be a great performer on the E-1. Very
> sharp images
> with good colour.
>
> Even though the E-1 frequently yields sharper shots than OM bodies,
> due to
> the relative absence of vibration, using a tripod usually gives even
> sharper
> images.
>
> I still have a heap of manual Zuikos (and others) and am shooting
> film most
> weeks.
>
> I'm probably shooting myself in the foot by writing this; but
> regarding the
> recent discussion about Tokina AT-X lenses, I have a Tok AT-X 24-40
> f/2.8,
> the only lens I have ever bought from KEH.
>
> It IS very sharp, but ... it has the weird and annoying
> characteristic of
> unexpectedly and unpredictably dumping a large round patch of blue
> (sky) in
> the middle of an image. So I haven't used it as much as I expected I
> would.
>
> Brian Swale
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|