Ali
It sounds as if this person could do with the 50/2 Macro (pricey) or
the 35/3.5 (DOF?). And what about the Sigma 30/1.4?
But Ag Schnozz is probably the most practised at portraits with his
E-1 and Zuikos if you're looking for something cheaper than the DZs.
But as you say, focusing in low light is likely to be a problem.
Chris
On 31 May 2007, at 18:46, Ali Shah wrote:
> Someone posed this question to me regarding an OM lens
> in place of the E-series kit lenses:
>
> "I am looking for a portrait lens that offers a
> smaller depth of field as compared to the E300 kit
> lenses. That way, I can do more with dof with
> portraiture, as well as have a lens that functions in
> lower light (without flash) as compared to the kit
> lenses.
>
> My thinking is that what I am looking for leads me
> towards an OM 50mm lens, with a low f-stop, maybe 1.8
> or something. Does that sound about right?"
>
> I am thinking the Zuiko 50mm F1.4? or 28mm series!?
> Not sure about use in low light tho.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|