Subject: | [OM] Re: FS: 18/3.5, 24/2.8, 35/2/ now Climbing Cameras |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:53:09 +1000 |
And yet it worked? Had one of those - great little beast and those lenses are great value. I still have a 40/2 Summicron-C and a 90/4 Elmar-C and just bought the M-Rokkor 28mm - waiting for it to arrive. Not as robust as a big M but with some nice features for its time. Unfortunately too long in the tooth now; difficult to find repair and parts with that flag meter and the rangefinder often both 'weary.' The Minolta CLE is a better deal now. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 30/04/2007, at 5:44 AM, Tim Hughes wrote: > The Leica/Minolta CL is smaller and probably a fair bit lighter? I > had a friend with a CL who used > to use it for caving and I have never seen such a scuffed up abused > camera before, it exuded dust > from every seam and had a soldered on adapter on the damaged hot > shoe. Enough to cause heart > failure in a Leica true believer! ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [photos] Stevens Glen, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Should I use this film?, Mike |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: uploaded photos, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: FS: 18/3.5, 24/2.8, 35/2/ now Climbing Cameras, Walt Wayman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |