Chris,
I agree with all that Martin says but would also suggest you
consider the 85/2 which, in my very humble and subjective opinion, has
the *best* bokeh of all the Zuiko lenses and has better
bang-for-the-buck and is smaller/lighter than the 100/2. Of course this
statement may be pure "sour grapes" on my part since I don't have no
stinkin' 100/2.
Charlie
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Martyn Smoothy
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 3:21 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Olympus 50mm f1.2 or 55mm f1.2 lenses bokeh?
Chris,
Not claiming that these are necessarily "good examples", & bokeh is
pretty
much absent in all of them unfortunately, but...
The "normal" pics on this page -
http://archaeoimages.com/Duxford-01/index.html - are taken with the 55mm
f1.2 (others use the 16mm fisheye - fairly obvious which are which).
All on this page were taken with the 50mm f1.2 -
http://archaeoimages.com/Venice-01/index.html. Sold the 55mm after I got
the
50mm (but it doesn't get a lot of use). Bokeh with the 100mm f2 is much
nicer :-)
Regards - Martyn
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Chris Crawford
Sent: 12 April 2007 18:29
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Olympus 50mm f1.2 or 55mm f1.2 lenses bokeh?
I've got a couple "Made in Japan" 50mm f1.8 lenses and hate them because
of
their harsh, ugly Bokeh, as in this example:
http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/fine_art/portfolio/antiwar/photopages/anni
vers
ary3.htm
I've heard that the 50 and 55mm f1.2 lenses were better in that respect.
Has
anyone used them? I'm not likely to use the lens wide open, mostly I'd
be
using it outdoors like the portrait example shown, at f4 or f5.6. I see
Olympus America has a 55 f1.2 on ebay for $350 and would consider buying
it
if it would solve my problem.
I've looked online and couldn't find any good example photos taken with
either lens.
Mike Johnson, the former magazine editor who runs the Online
Photographer
blog says that the 40mm f2 has beautiful bokeh, but its expensive ($525
at
Keh) and I haven't seen much taken with it either.
Thanks,
--
Chris Crawford
Photography & Graphic Design
Santa Fe, New Mexico
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com
http://www.plumpatrin.com Something the world NEEDS.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|