Subject: | [OM] Re: lighting, the case for packs |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:35:12 -0500 |
Most blimp customers demand really, really, really big enlargements and low ISO (1600 or so) is required to minimize noise. :-) Chuck Norcutt AG Schnozz wrote: > Oh, the horror! I forgot to snip! > > I guess I still trying to figure out why lighting that blimp hanger > is such a problem. With the Canon, you just crank up the ISO. > > AG ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Hauppauge Service Center, Richard Ociepka |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Communications [was lighting], Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: lighting, the case for packs, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: lighting, the case for packs, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |