Subject: | [OM] Re: Noise reduction |
---|---|
From: | James King <jking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:55:28 +0000 |
I use neat image and like it. There is both a photoshop plug in available and a stand along program with batch facility - if you buy the professional version. It works well for me (slide film). I apply a little grain removal and sometimes use the sharpenning too. The only slight problem with it is that if you decide to use it on raw files which are gamma 1.0 e.g. raw from vuescan then even with a profile it tends to over clean dark areas resulting in featureless dark rocks etc. If you convert to gamma 2.0 first it works far better. The docs are fairly well written and its easy to use one calibrated. I have thrown it at 64bit RGBI medium format scans of over 500MB and its handled them without dying (true I have 3GBytes of ram and 8GB of swapspace). Its been fairly robust. I had one or two crashes from the photshop plug in but the original files was not damaged and I think photoshop even managed to continue. Regards James ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: sometimes you take a photo that just makes you smile - enjoy, John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Noise reduction, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Noise reduction, ch_photo |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OT Lavasoft news, Johann Thorsson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |