It states on the pdf manual that the demo loses its exif.
Stu
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I meant to suggest that you should check the help file for mention of
> EXIF. You may find that preserving EXIF is an option. I never paid any
> attention to that since I was only cleaning up film scans which had no
> EXIF data.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>
>> Check the dimensions of the image. You'll probably find the number of
>> pixels is still the same. My guess is that by reducing the amount of
>> noise you've reduced the information content of the image and a JPEG
>> compression can be more efficient.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Stuart Robinson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Amazing. In the half hour since you posted this, I've downloaded Neat
>>> Image & had a play with one image. The difference is remarkable! One
>>> thing though & I don't know if this happens on the full version is, my
>>> original image was 3.44MB after filtering it became 1.06MB. It also
>>> loses it's exif data, that's easy to get around by backing it up first
>>> with Exifer. Why though has the file shrunk?
>>>
>>> Stu
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I think the two major contenders are Neat Image and Noise Ninja. These
>>>> reviews are a couple of years old and I would suspect that,
>>>> technologically, they're probably equal. At the time of the reviews
>>>> both were only available as stand alones but I would guess they're
>>>> probably available as PS plug-ins by now.
>>>>
>>>> I have old, freebie versions of both and I preferred Neat Image but I
>>>> haven't done any serious film scanning in a long time which is where it
>>>> was really needed. VueScan incorporates grain/noise reduction in its
>>>> filter menu but I've never used that part of VueScan since it was added.
>>>> I keep the Min*lta A1 at ISO 100 95% of the time so there is really no
>>>> need for noise reduction there. I've taken a few ISO 3200 shots with
>>>> the 5D but have never had to print anything large taken at that speed
>>>> and haven't been driven to clean any images.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/software/noise-ninja.shtml>
>>>> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/software/neatimage.shtml>
>>>>
>>>> Fred Miranda also has noise reduction plug-in software that works on
>>>> scanned film or JPEGs or raw files right out of the camera for only $20.
>>>> Sounds useful and inexpensive but I don't know anything else about it.
>>>> <http://www.fredmiranda.com/shopping/Xpro>
>>>>
>>>> Picture Window Pro also has noise reduction as part of the "advanced
>>>> sharpen" function but I've never use the noise reduction part.
>>>>
>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Phil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Do any you guys have any experience with noise reduction programs
>>>>> Would appreciate any guidance
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Phil
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================
>>>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> ==============================================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ==============================================
>>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> ==============================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|