Subject: | [OM] Re: Canon or Nikon: was What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . . |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:12:50 -0800 |
I have never seen an example of it in spite of the frequency of the allegation, images abused with too much noise reduction or gaussian blur excepted. I think it is just one of the groundless accusations hurled by brand loyalists. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Nov 30, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > As to "plastic skin" I don't understand the complaint since I don't > think it exists... at least with my camera. Check the skin tone > quality > shootout at smartshooter.com. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Canon or Nikon: was What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . ., AG Schnozz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Canon or Nikon: was What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . ., Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Canon or Nikon: was What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . ., AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Canon or Nikon: was What would you do? Now: Horse racing and dog. Well sort of . . ., Winsor Crosby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |