Thanks. I did briefly browse that page but didn't pay it much attention.
Chuck Norcutt
Richard M. Smith wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>>I dunno. Got a reference?
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>AG Schnozz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>However he hasn't demonstrated that that is the case for a
>>>>D200/5D comparison and, even if it is, you may be right about
>>>>there being no disecernable difference at 16x20 or whatever
>>>>is the relevant print size for your sales.
>>>
>>>Hah, didn't somebody's test show that 8x10's from the 5D were
>>>much sharper than D200 prints? Something like 100% of the
>>>people could pick out the 5D 8x10s?
>>>
>>>AG-give me a break-Schnozz
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>
>
>
> You probably have already seen this.
>
> http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Nikon-D200-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Head-to-Head-Review-/Performance--Image-Quality.htm
>
> Dick Smith
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|