Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I dunno. Got a reference?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> AG Schnozz wrote:
>
>>> However he hasn't demonstrated that that is the case for a
>>> D200/5D comparison and, even if it is, you may be right about
>>> there being no disecernable difference at 16x20 or whatever
>>> is the relevant print size for your sales.
>>
>> Hah, didn't somebody's test show that 8x10's from the 5D were
>> much sharper than D200 prints? Something like 100% of the
>> people could pick out the 5D 8x10s?
>>
>> AG-give me a break-Schnozz
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
You probably have already seen this.
http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Nikon-D200-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Head-to-Head-Review-/Performance--Image-Quality.htm
Dick Smith
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|