> Perhaps the advantage that a C*non (or maybe N*kon) would
> bring is the ability to throw away pixels.
Actually, the biggest advantage to a C/N isn't pixels, high-ISO
performance (we're talking newsprint here, not 20x30
landscapes), or even AF speed. It's the ability to use "pool
equipment". If you're shooting for somebody that has a 600/4
available to you, get the camera that will use that lens.
For wedding work, anything will do if you can adapt your
shooting methods around the limitations. There are still a few
holdouts that are shooting weddings with manual-focus,
manual-wind, manual-exposure medium-format cameras.
AG
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates
(http://voice.yahoo.com)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|