Would be great, if he shot the same scene with E330/E500/E1 or maybe 5D, to
compare with E400 with the same iso.
On 10/30/06, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> It would be interesting to compare them, Chuck. But I like what I
> see with the E-400.
>
> Chris
> On 30 Oct 2006, at 01:03, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> > That's very good then. I did actually look at two of the small size
> > food shots and didn't notice that they were shot at 800. There was no
> > noise jumping out at me. I can see it now in the full size image
> > and it
> > looks better than I would have expected. The noise in this image:
> > <http://img2.dpreview.com/gallery/olympuse400_samples/originals/
> > pa200260.jpg>
> > seems to have a creamy, film grain like quality. Even the black parts
> > of the image (whatever they are) are not screaming "noise".
> >
> > I'll still take my 5D but I don't think the E-1 could do this well
> > at 800.
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
--
when you were born, a problem was solved
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|