Unfortunately, Phil's not going to compare them for you. I don't
understand his reasoning. Even though the camera won't be avialable in
North America (any time soon at least) it's an important development for
Olympus and the test would show whether they're making progress or not.
Chuck Norcutt
Chris Barker wrote:
> It would be interesting to compare them, Chuck. But I like what I
> see with the E-400.
>
> Chris
> On 30 Oct 2006, at 01:03, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>
>>That's very good then. I did actually look at two of the small size
>>food shots and didn't notice that they were shot at 800. There was no
>>noise jumping out at me. I can see it now in the full size image
>>and it
>>looks better than I would have expected. The noise in this image:
>><http://img2.dpreview.com/gallery/olympuse400_samples/originals/
>>pa200260.jpg>
>>seems to have a creamy, film grain like quality. Even the black parts
>>of the image (whatever they are) are not screaming "noise".
>>
>>I'll still take my 5D but I don't think the E-1 could do this well
>>at 800.
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|