David Irisarri wrote:
> Wow Moose,
>
> Very, very well explained. Lovely answer.
Uh, er, blush, thank you.
> I am also will you that 14-54 is truly superb!
As I said, I was going on the word of others, but so many of them, some
of whom I know and whose photographic judgment I trust, that I can't
believe otherwise.
> I also agree with Chuck about working distances and this is
> why I work with ZD 50/2 for macro work
All useful info, but it seemed to me that the issue of poor sharpness
with the existing 14-54 needs to be addressed before going off to other
lenses. If the cause is something other than the lens, getting a new
lens will only compound the frustration.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|