Subject: | [OM] Re: ZD 50mm f/2 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:59:53 -0400 |
I beg to disagree. I would suggest taking actual picutures with them as Gary did. Chuck Norcutt David Irisarri wrote: > > Something very important to take into account is that old lenses were > analysed using 10 lines/mm and 30 lines/mm but never 20 lines/mm for > contrast and 60 lines/mm for resolution. IMHO there is no way comparing OM > lenses to new ZD lenses. Let´s see how OM lenses perform with 10-15 Mpixel > E-X cameras. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [photo] another sunrise, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Bibble E-1 profile, james olson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: ZD 50mm f/2, Supat S. |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: ZD 50mm f/2, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |