Subject: | [OM] Re: Film Vs. Digital |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:24:56 -0700 (PDT) |
> Because of your tests, I've used Ilford Galerie Classic with > my i960 and been a happy camper. :) Any chance you might > retire the S9000 for the Pro9500? I'd be interested to know > whether there is a removable head assembly for the pigment > inks similar to the one used in the 1960. Thanks for the feedback on the IGC/i960. I'm glad you are happy. I'm not sure what my next printer is yet. We went "house hunting" tonight and I'm struggling with enough space for a pocket camera much less another printer. AG __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 35 shift availability?, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Value of 24 & 35 shifts, 18/3.5, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film Vs. Digital, Richard Lovison |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film Vs. Digital, Richard Lovison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |