[OM] Re: Film Vs. Digital

[Chuck Norcutt]

Even traditional chemical prints don't stand up to that test very well. 
  I don't know the answer but I'll bet the pigment ink prints do better. 
  Paper is a big variable.  See the Wilhelm Imaging link I just posted 
on a previous mail.  <http://www.wilhelm-research.com/>

Chuck Norcutt


james king wrote:

> 
>>On 9/17/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Good article but I think he's wrong about the longevity of color ink jet
>>>prints.  Current pigmented ink prints probably are good for 100 years or
>>>maybe more.  Conventional color chemical prints probably only 1/3 of
>>>that.  B&W with archival quality processing is a different story.
>>>
>>>Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> the longevity figures I have seen are far media behind glass in a 
> picture frame etc. I want to see figures for media just left on the 
> table by a window etc. I.e. worst case rather than best case
> James
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================