Olympus had an approach with a product lineup that is distinguished by the
number of chips such as 1-chip DSLR, 2-chip DSLR and 3-chip DSLR. The idea
was to use these to identify E-x, E-xx and E-xxx. I'm not sure if this idea
survived. And if you asked me, I'm far more intrigued by the 1-chip DSLR
because to me, that is personally all I need. As for the two-chip design, we
all have that now, dont we. The three-chip design? Now that should get at
least some of you wondering.....
K.
On 13/09/06, David Irisarri <div2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> CANON!!!
>
> ItI would be like jumping to one swimmingpool full of ebola ;-)
> Why not three CCD or CMOS? It would be the best way to get perfect colour
> accuracy? Hmmm, I think Minolta tried this solution long time ago. You can
> split a light beam to three CCDs; as we are usign fourthirds sensors, they
> are smaller than 35mm sensor and camera won´t be too bulky. What do you
> think Khen? ;-)
>
> Dave
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "AG Schnozz" <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 6:44 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: megapixel capacity of the E-3
>
>
> >> sensor. None of them have a Kodak sensor. There are surprises
> >> in there. I hope they make the right choice; the one I have
> >> in mind because that sensor will produce absolutely stunning
> >> natural colours.
> >
> > Ok, the "stunning natural colours" would be a characteristic of
> > a Kodak or Dalsa sensor, but it seems apparant that the Kodak
> > connection is DEAD DEAD DEAD! So, who else has "stunning
> > natural colours"? Fuji. Hmmm. That'd be nice. I could live
> > with that. Give me another three-stops of dynamic range too? :)
> >
> > But I'm going to speculate for a second and get my own almonds
> > in a vice and say that it could be a Canon CMOS sensor. Why do
> > I say that? I'm making a guess that there was a "technology
> > trade agreement" with the dust-shaker. It seems unlikely,
> > though, as Canon generally "goes it alone" with everything
> > they've done in the photographic world. A Canon CMOS sensor
> > would take care of any arguments against 4/3 as being "noisy".
> >
> > But, in the end, it wouldn't suprise me if they bought some
> > oddball sensor from "Wang's House of Overruns and Sweepers".
> >
> > AG
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
--
Khen Lim
XIOS Network Solutions
IBM Business Partner
+60 +16 528 6010 / 016 528 6010
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|