> sensor. None of them have a Kodak sensor. There are surprises
> in there. I hope they make the right choice; the one I have
> in mind because that sensor will produce absolutely stunning
> natural colours.
Ok, the "stunning natural colours" would be a characteristic of
a Kodak or Dalsa sensor, but it seems apparant that the Kodak
connection is DEAD DEAD DEAD! So, who else has "stunning
natural colours"? Fuji. Hmmm. That'd be nice. I could live
with that. Give me another three-stops of dynamic range too? :)
But I'm going to speculate for a second and get my own almonds
in a vice and say that it could be a Canon CMOS sensor. Why do
I say that? I'm making a guess that there was a "technology
trade agreement" with the dust-shaker. It seems unlikely,
though, as Canon generally "goes it alone" with everything
they've done in the photographic world. A Canon CMOS sensor
would take care of any arguments against 4/3 as being "noisy".
But, in the end, it wouldn't suprise me if they bought some
oddball sensor from "Wang's House of Overruns and Sweepers".
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|