Thanks. Don't know how I missed that as I looked at the Oly link. Not
enough coffee yet I guess. Well, anyhow Tim got a lesson in constant
aperture zooms, weight considerations and potential problems with small
apertures. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Bernard Frangoulis wrote:
>>One thing to note on the Sigma is that it is not a constant aperture
>>lens like the ZD.
>
> No, the ZD 50-200mm is f/2.8-3.5 (otherwise it would be much bigger), and the
> ZD 40-150mm is f/3.5-4.5.
>
> Bernard
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|