I've been thinking about a PhotoRunner since you mentioned yours about a
week ago. I like the idea of the waist belt.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>>I think your view of a backpack bag will be colored by whether you want
>>to consider it a tranport bag or a shooting bag. If you're out trekking
>>the wilderness I guess it has to be both. But my recent purchase of the
>>Canon bag was as a convenient transport to and from places where I can
>>establish a base indoors and just visit the bag as needed.
>
> Exactly! A little creepy that we so often come up with the same
> solutions, no?
>
>>Things like weddings and bar mitzvah parties come to mind. Even an
>>architectural shoot would be good.
>
> At least we differ here, as I don't do those things. :-) The Canon
> bag is strictly for transport. I use a LowePro PhotoRunner when out
> tromping about. It works with good shoulder strap or hideaway belt as
> fanny/spare tire pack. I have carried an OM-4 with zoom and two other
> lenses in it, but generally the camera is around my neck or in my hand
> and the PhotoRunner carries up lenses and accessories.
>
>>Carry all the gear, drop it on a convenient table (or tailgate) and feed out
>>of it as needed
>
> My backpack is often in a car trunk, mine or rented.
>
>>I'll definitely use something smaller and less cumbersome when on a brief
>>walk through a local park.
>>
>
> The PhotoRunner, and I assume similar bags, is good for that and also
> for longer jaunts.
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|